Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Politics Ramble - www.politicsramble.com/ Politics Has Many Proverbial Forks In The Road

PACKAGING PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SATAN GOES MAINSTREAM IN A MALL NEAR YOU!

June 30th 2008 04:47
Steven Barrett

IMAGINE ONE DAY YOU'RE TAKING YOUR KIDS OR GRANDKIDS TO A LOCAL MALL TO VISIT A FAVORITE TOY STORE, OR ONE OF THOSE NICHE STORES WHERE KIDS CAN MAKE THEIR OWN BEARS, AND JUST A FEW STORES BETWEEN YOU AND THE STORE YOU'RE GOING TO VISIT IS A BRAND NEW PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION CENTER.

THAT'S RIGHT -- JUST A FEW STORES AWAY FROM A TOY STORE FOR KIDS (AND ADULTS LIKE YOUR'S TRULY WHO'S STILL A BIG KID AT HEART) IS AN ABORTION MILL.

ONE STOREFRONT PROMOTES MIRTH AND THE JOY OF LIFE GIVEN TO US BY A LOVING GOD.

THE OTHER STOREFRONT REPRESENTS ONE OF THE MOST DIABOLICAL ORGANIZATIONS, SHORT OF THE NAZI PARTY AND KU KLUX KLAN.


PPF WAS FOUNDED BY MARGARET SANGER WHO BELIEVED IN EUGENICS, AND ELIMINATING INCONVENIENT PEOPLE, SUCH AS THE SLOW, THE POOR AND YES, EVEN MINORITY BABIES.
Don't let the word get out we target black kids PPF
The KKK and American Nazi Party Couldn't Have Said It Better


THE PPF CENTER PROBABLY WON'T BE ONE OF THEIR REAL EXTERMINATION CENTERS, BUT IT'LL PROVIDE THE USUAL AMOUNT OF DECEITFUL PROPAGANDA AND OF COURSE, THOSE EVER CONVENIENT "PLAN B" AND OTHER ABORTIFACIENTS.
This is the PPF's legacy it doesn't want you to see.
Planned Parenthood Foundation's Legacy of Death


OF COURSE, THIS ISN'T THE IMAGE PPF WANTS TO PROJECT, SO LIKE ALL BUSINESSES, IT HAS TO REPACKAGE ITSELF NOW AND THEN. (AFTER ALL, PPF, WHICH RECEIVES MILLIONS OF TAXPAYERS' DOLLARS ALREADY) IS A BIT CONCERNED ABOUT ITS IMAGE AND LET'S FACE IT, THE RIGHT IMAGE SELLS AND SALES ARE WHAT DRIVES PROFITS UP AND THAT DRIVES THE VALUE OF STOCKS UP AS WELL.

OH YES, PPF IS A PUBLICLY OWNED COMPANY AND NOT AT ALL THE EVER SO CONCERNED AGENCY ITS SPINMEISTERS WOULD LOVE TO BAMBOOZLE AN ALREADY GULLIBLE PUBLIC INTO BELIEVING ANY MORE OF ITS LIES ACCORDING TO A COLUMN ("TRYING TO PUT LIPSTICK ON A PIG") BY KEN CONNOR AND PUBLISHED IN TOWNHALL.COM SUNDAY JUNE 29TH:

According to Stephanie Simon of the Wall Street Journal, Planned Parenthood wants to "[open] new avenues for boosting revenue and, they hope, political clout." The first step in the organization's redo involves marketing itself to customers in a higher income bracket
.

Planned Parenthood is building new centers with larger waiting areas, wooden floors, nice lighting and other amenities which create a more inviting environment and, presumably, make clients feel less shameful about the act they are contemplating. A new "green" clinic is going up in Massachusetts, made of recycled and earth-friendly materials.

"Express centers" are being located in malls so that young women can have quick and easy access to birth control, tests for sexually transmitted diseases and counseling. Gift shops make the centers more appealing to their young clientele.


MAKES YOU WONDER WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO SELL AT THOSE GIFT SHOPS TO COMPETE WITH THE TOY STORES AND MAKE A STUFFED BEAR OR OTHER ANIMAL TYPE SHOPS. NO ... MAYBE THEY CAN SELL SANGER DOLLS WITH A PIG'S FACE DAUBED WITH RED LIPSTICK ALL OVER IT.

HERE'S ONE FOR THE GUYS: HOW ABOUT THOSE SCENTED RUBBER URINAL PADS WITH MAGGIE'S PICTURE ON IT. AND TO BE PC -- MAKE SURE THEY HAVE GREEN BACKINGS.
HOW 'BOUT SATAN DOLLS, WITH LITTLE WADS OF DOLLAR BILLS STICKING OUT OF HIS WHITE DOCTOR'S FROCK COAT?

BUT WHY IS PPF GOING TO SUCH LENGTHS AND EXPENSES TO PROMOTE ITSELF WHEN IT'S ALREADY DOING A BLOODY GOOD JOB OF RACKING UP BODIES AND PROFITS AT THE SAME TIME: CONNOR AGAIN --

Planned Parenthood perpetuates Sanger's legacy by presenting "choice" as a means of improving the lives of individuals and communities by eliminating unwanted, "inconvenient" children. Its clinics dispose of over 200,000 such children per year. The number of abortions provided by Planned Parenthood hit an all-time high in the 2005-2006 fiscal year.

This high body count, no doubt, is part of the reason Planned Parenthood wants to change its abortion-centered public image. Nevertheless, the organization will not quit
providing abortions or discourage them. Rather, it is hoping to hide its assault on human life behind nice new amenities. Apparently it believes that comfortable furniture, soft lighting and convenient locations will help people forget what goes on behind the closed doors of the surgical ward.

The new "green" Planned Parenthood building is, perhaps, the most ironic element of its remodeling plan. The organization proudly proclaims its concern for the environment even as it destroys more human beings than any other group in America. Planned Parenthood is the most infamous organization in an industry which kills more than twice as many Americans per year as cancer. By "going green," Planned Parenthood is attempting to hide its true color, red—the color of the blood produced by its daily death toll
.

SEEING THAT THEY'LL BE LOCATED INSIDE ENCLOSED MALLS, PROTESTS WILL CERTAINTLY BE MORE EASILY CONTROLLED. YOU CAN BET SOME KID'S BABY BOOTIES THAT OTHER STORE OWNERS AND SPACE RENTERS WON'T WANT ANY "CONTROVERSIAL DEMONSTRATIONS" GOING ON THAT COULD DETER POSSIBLE SALES.

AND I DON'T BLAME THEM, BUT, AND THIS BUT IS A BIGGIE -- THEY OUGHT TO BE HOWLING AT THE MALL OWNERS TO BAR ANY PPF CENTERS FROM RENTING EVEN AN INCH OF SPACE IN THOSE BUILDINGS TO PPF.

THE MALL PLOY IS ONLY ONE PART OF PPF'S RECENT AGGRESSIVE PUSH LATELY. IT'S WORMED ITS WAY INTO CHRISTIAN ANNUITY PLANS, MUTUAL STOCK PLANS, AND EVEN TEMPORARILY CONNED A HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHAPTER IN SARASOTA, FLORIDA TO GIVE IT A SPECIAL HAND ON A BUILDING PERMIT.

AND THIS FORM OF PERNICIOUS, AND DIABOLICALLY EVIL FORM OF ECONOMIC DARWINISM IS BEING PAID FOR BY PEOPLE WHO FIND ABORTION UTTERLY UNACCEPTABLE. THEY'RE CALLED TAXPAYERS, AND OF COURSE, A LOT OF THEM HAVE KIDS AND GRANDKIDS WHO LOVE GOING TO TOY STORES AND WOULD NEVER WANT TO HAVE TO ASK THEIR MOMS, DADS AND GRANDPARENTS WHAT GOES ON IN THOSE OFFICES.













88
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
57 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 14:55
Wow! Steven, this one is so good, I'm going to advertise it for you! Everyone needs to know!!!

Comment by Josie

June 30th 2008 15:31
I appreciate you letting people know about the stores, but I think you need to be careful about some of your facts. I'm not pro-abortion necessarily, I just like to make sure all the facts presented are correct so people can make up their minds based on the truth. For example, Sanger's quote you have listed is taken out of context. At the time, some thought she was trying to externimate the black race in the South by offering abortions to the pregnant girls. Her quote in context:
"The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the [Birth Control] Federation [of America] as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 15:37
Actually, Josie, regardless of Sangers purported intentions toward eliminating as many black babies as possible, the current PPF does have that in mind. On Hannity's America a few weeks ago they tried an experiment. One of the show's producers called a PPF office and said he wanted to donate money, provided that all of it went to kill black babies in an inner city. PPF agreed. The producer then said he thought we "had enough of them and needed to get rid of more" (or words very close to that). The PPF rep. agreed to see to it that only black abortions would be paid for with his money. The racism and prejudice are still there.

Comment by Anonymous

June 30th 2008 15:45
This is disgusting!!!!! I am outraged! I will be protesting this type of thing from happening as will most, if not every, member of my church!!! Thank you for writing this important post!

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 15:46
Oh Josie, you had to go and let the facts get in the way of a good story didn't you?

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 15:52
As usual, Ruby, your knowledge of facts is both selective and fleeting. Margaret Sanger being taken slightly out of context gets your attention and enables you to comment about facts while not mentioning the indesputable facts that are also available. You never mentioned the PPF "offices" going in to malls. You never disputed the findings of Hannity's America, and you had nothing to say about investment money being used to fund abortions without the permission of those to whom the money belongs. Once again, Ruby, you have proven yourself to be nothing but a pro-abortion hack. (Yes, pun intended!)

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 16:03
What difference does it make where the abortion clinic is?

What are you afraid the staff are gong to run out into the mall and hack up live children on their lunch break?

Hannity's America. Please if you will provide me with an actual transcript of that show.

Bradish, you should know by now that I don't believe a single word you say.

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 16:17
"Express centers" are being located in malls so that young women can have quick and easy access to birth control, tests for sexually transmitted diseases and counseling

Oh my God!!!!

Access to birth control!

Tests for STD's!

Counselling!

Those monsters!

When will the madness end?

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 16:23
Of course, Ruby. You need to protect your ignorance at all costs, don't you? Wouldn't want you to learn anything that might make your twisted ideas look bad.

If you think that abortion clinics only provide birth control and treatment for STD's, you really do live in a fantasy world. They kill babies in those places, Ruby. That's their "bread and butter" and they eat it up like the pigs they are. What sort of "counselling" do you think they give? Abstinence?

I'll see if there's a transcript available for Hannity's America, but you probably won't believe that, either.

Comment by Anonymous

June 30th 2008 16:25
S.L. Thank you very much! If you get a chance, there's another article written by Star Parker appearing in today's Townhall.com about the same subject; i.e. Black Genocide.

I just don't get it. I've been to too many military cemtaries in Europe (unfortunately not Normandy's), Civil War sites, not to mention what I saw at Dachau, and the enforced poverty/oppression of East Berlin right after the Wall was built to comprehend what we're doing to ourselves, regardless of race.

It's as if we took a gun called affluence and used it to shoot ourselves in the feet, head and well ... to get out of the struggle of life.

Ever notice that most the biggest proponents of legal abortion can be found with our most financially secure and stable occupations; i.e. non-profits, colleges (well, not counting their endowments, and that's a whole different breed of horse to break) and think tanks, etc. Ivory tower occupations. It's not as if having an additional child or two would break their banks. But, oh, wouldn't those rug rats be an "inconvenience" and "drag" on one's career pursuits!
Gotta git. But thanks for your encouraging remarks and keep up your own great work, too. Even when I don't agree with a certain point, I like the way you put it.

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 16:41
Ruby, I couldn't find a link to the actual transcript. All I could find was the post I wrote at the time. Feel free to locate a transcript on your own.
Really Long Link

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 16:42
yes Bradish, I am well aware of what abortion clinics do, but those offices that they are setting up in the malls are not abortion clinics but centres which provide the above services.

this whole post is a farce.

i'll leave you to your misery.

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 16:43
It's like the "greenies", Steven. Their Ivory Towers have all the conveniences they expect us to do without. They're big on theory but very lite on reality and common sense.

Comment by Steven P. Barrett

June 30th 2008 18:06
Josie,

I hear what you're saying. When it comes to Sanger, however, that woman's track record affords her little to be said on her behalf.

She has none and deserves none. As for her comments, the more I looked into the quote you included in your comments and tried to balance them in context with her lifetime committment to eugenics and what that to -- sorry, I'm not about to budge.

If she didn't want to look like she was trying to exterminate blacks, it's because she knew she'd gone over the edge and was trying to cover her sorry keister.

While I didn't intend on starting up a firestorm over Sanger/Eugenics/white racism/abortion and racial extermination, it looks like the seedbed of a post to come.

Let's just say reading about the connection between the Eugenics Institute at Cold Spring on Long Island, its funding by Carneige, Ford and its connection to PPF through Sanger -- not to mention who also supported Cold Spring, e/a, Woodrow Wilson, Oliver Wendell Holmes and of course, the Nazis -- this subject is bound to upset a lot of readers' preconceptions abou t such historical figures and leading instittions. It's NOT a pretty picture. Not by any measure.

It took "mankind" from Cold Spring to Haldemar to Auschwitz to Planned Parenthood Foundation's local killing centers about to open near a Mall and one of its toy stores in your city, town or neighborhood.

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 18:12
It's amazing how one post will bring in comments of all sorts and change direction time and again, Steven. I've seen it happen repeatedly. Makes for some interesting reading, though! And the firestorm effect can run absolutely wild sometimes!

Comment by Josie

June 30th 2008 19:21
I don't like any organization to have "political" clout as they apparently have planned, but thats not really the point of the article is it? Putting aside Sanger's personal beliefs and Planned Parenthood, I have to wonder if you all would protest any clinic who provides this service? If so, you should shut down any drug store in the mall because they give out birth control and have condoms.

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 19:48
Just speaking for myself, Josie, yes. If by "this service" you mean abortions. There's a big difference between preventing a pregnancy by the use of birth control and killing a child. Drug stores also sell aspirin, cold remedies, band-aids, and life-saving prescriptions that have nothing to do with the slaughter of babies.

Comment by Josie

June 30th 2008 20:12
The clinics in question won't provide abortions- even if they are affiliated with ones who do. By "service" I mean the birth control, information, and testing. My OBGYN and other specialists and hospitals provide abortions too. Should we then protest any hospital who sets up an information and freebies booth at a local family carnival? Should I refuse medical care by the emergency crew affiliated with that hospital? As I said, I'm not "pro-abortion" personally and I don't like for any organization to get governement money, but I just don't see what is so shocking about this storefront business. Anyway, even if I disagree with your writing, great job writing a piece thats getting attention Steven!

Comment by S.L.

June 30th 2008 20:44

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 22:17
Steven you are being extremely dishonest on two counts,

1. Josie has informed you your quote is incorrect yet you "refuse to budge:. Who are you to assign a quote to person even though it is actually the exact opposite of what they intended to say?

2. You are claiming that PP is opening up abortion clinics in the malls when in fact they are not doing so.

Now if you feel so strongly on this issue that you must fight it, then by all means do so, but fight it with truth and honesty and integrity.

Don't spread dirty, filthy lies. The world has too much of that already.

Comment by Anonymous

June 30th 2008 22:42
Ruby, I was repeating what a reliable source, the Wall Street Journal has reported. Does it surprise you that PPF would do this?

Please read the full story and you'll see how it all connects with PPF's recent agenda, which is pretty aggressive.

The WSJ got wind of it, reported on it and PPF hasn't denied what they're up to? Where's the deceit?

I've long felt that being "politically incorrect" is really a matter of being politically discomforting to others who disagree with you, especially if those others have an agenda, open or otherwise, that they're going to enforce come hell or high water. I've seen and experienced this in academic institutions more times than I'd care to admit.

I'm not generally wont to throw words like fascist around like loose quarters, but I've had a few quarters thrown in my direction -- officially, no less -- with no apologies offered aftewards by an official who knew better, all because I dared to utter something completely innocuous during a campus-wide staff holiday planning committee session, not less!

Anyhow, I thought the topic was abortion and PPF's very aggressive capitalistic approach. Leave it to PPF to give economic darwinism a black eye, which takes some doing.

Comment by Damo

June 30th 2008 23:14
Margret Sanger is pride of place on the Planned Parenthood website. Yet they strangely ignore any of her history as a Eugenicist, her associations with the KKK and he long history of race targeted abortion.

Her motto was 'Racial Hygiene'.

Comment by RubySoho

June 30th 2008 23:24
Damo, could you be more irrelevant?

Steven, the article you posted clearly states that the centres to built in malls are not abortion clinics.

And at the end of the day what you are disregarding is the fact that PP is providing a service to women who have come to them requesting that service. It is not as though they are rounding up women en masse and forcing them to have abortions against their will.


Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 00:03
Since Margaret Sanger was mentioned in the article and defended in some of the comments, Ruby, how can you say that Damo's comment was irrelevant? Did you even bother to check the link to Star Parker?

Just speaking for myself again, but those "clinics" have no place around malls! I can hear it now, "I'm just going to buy a pair of earrings and arrange for an abortion. I'll be at the mall!" Or, "Here baby, you check out the toy store while Mommy goes to get some birth control for a hot date."

Planned Parenthood does NOT belong around any family-oriented locations.


Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 00:46
For the millionth time Bradish those centres at the mall are not for abortions.

Are you know saying that birth control, STD tests and counselling are bad things too?

Once again you are disregarding facts and getting carried away with your anger.

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 01:25
Obviously, Ruby, you didn't read what I wrote, but invented your own interpretation (as usual.) I didn't say "going to the mall to HAVE an abortion." I used the term "arrange for." There's a difference. But if you're having some sort of fantasy that the PPF creatures at the mall offices won't mention abortion or won't schedule appointments in their "butcher shop" you might want to wake up and try thinking. It's their line of "work", Ruby. They'll do their best to sell it, no matter where their "clinics" are located.

Comment by Damo

July 1st 2008 03:40
Ruby
Could you be more bad mannered?

I guess so judging by you track record.

Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 03:48
Bradish no matter how much you try to blame abortion on organisations such as PP, the fact remains that women generally have them because they want to. They have made the decision. If not for PP and other medical clinics providing the service, then women will be at risk of unsafe, "backyard" abortions.

It's not as if abortion didn't exist before PP. No matter how much you detest the practise, there have always been and will always be women who desperately seek out abortions. And there will always be others who are willing to help them through the experience.

Steven, I see you have not bothered to correct your mistakes.

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 03:53
So, Ruby, does this mean (in your strange point of view) that since some people will always want to do drugs we shouldn't prosecute the dealers? After all, they are providing a service...

Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 04:01
My strange point of view? You mean the point of view that the law agrees with in this case? That strange point of view?

You know how I feel about this issue. I am not here to argue about the rights and wrongs of abortion. Even though I disagree with it, you are entitled to your opinion. I am merely asking that you all stick to the facts and the truth instead of omitting vital information, lying and making irrelevant comments (Damo).

Comment by S.L.

July 1st 2008 04:09
I've been reading this post and the comments all day, Ruby. Damo's comment was entirely relevant since it was both mentioned in the original post and then discounted in a comment. It was not only relevant, but accurate as well.

As far as Steven not backing down from one sentence in the original post, he already explained why. Margaret Sanger was notoriously eager to kill as many black people as possible and not hesitant about admitting it. Just because she uttered one sentence that sounded a little otherwise doesn't make it untrue.

And you never answered my question, Ruby. People will do drugs, so should we not prosecute the dealers? It follows your "logic" perfectly.

Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 05:31
If you must know, I think the 'war on drugs' is a waste of time and I favour a harm minimisation policy. Legalise it, regulate it and there won't be any drug dealers to prosecute. It worked with alcohol.

And i thought that damo's comments are irrelevent as I don't see why PP has to pay attention to Sanger's relationship to the KKK, whatever it may have been, when it has nought to do with what PP is today.

So Bradish, you think it is okay to falsely attribute a quote to a person? Of course you do. You've done it often enough yourself.

The whole entire premise of this post is farcical since PP does not plan to open abortion clinics in the malls. Once again, in the absence of evidence the pro-life lobby resorts to lies, slander and fear mongering.

Two major blunders in this which I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt to if he would just admit his mistakes but in failing to do that this post becomes just another lie.

Comment by Harmony

July 1st 2008 05:43
As a matter of fact women don't usually go to abortion mills freely. They are pressured. The number one cause of death of pregnant women is homicide. Murder! Why? Someone didn't want her to have a baby. Who? The husband? Boyfriend? Parents? Why? She is somone's toy, object of pleasure, nothing else. Why else would a woman give up who she is and was created to be? Women are created to be LIFE GIVERS and NURTURERS. Why would they decide to go against who they are? Motherhood is far more fulfilling than a career. Believe it or not - your choice.
When one becomes someone else's object of pleasure without responsibility it affects them. Look at any magazine and the ads therein and tell me that women are not objects. Some are happy to be. Attention goes a long way, especially when a girl is deprived of real affection for who she really is while growing up. If a womean is an object what is her unborn child.?

I often think of an incident someone witnessed and told me about . A man on the other side of the river delivered a baby and then smashed it among the rocks, leaving it there as food for wild animals. The woman was in tears (and pain - all kinds of pain) begging for the life of her child.

Tell me we are a civilized society. PP just makes death look sanitary. Do the math. 200,000 children a year slaughtered by PP. That's over 5,000 a day. If there were some type of illness that took the lives of 5,000 americans a day don't you believe the government would be doing something about it? What's so sacred about abortion?
Pleasure, money and control. Plain and simple.

We, as a socitey are so sex inundated we can't imagine a loving relationship without it. And we've become so irresponsible that we cannot accept the consequences of our lack of self discipline.

Go ahead, tell me I'm out of line. I don't care. I just hope that something I have said makes you THINK!
The truth is: were talking about human lives; little people who are fully human in every way who need nothing to make them more fully humen, just shelter, nurishment and protection (that includes mother love). What do you need to be more fully human? Nothing, just shelter, nurishment and protection. So why are we so caloused about killing these human beings?

Just as an exercise of empathy, put yourself in a womb in your imagination, feel the comfort of mother, hear the heartbeat, hear every conversation, hear mother's tears, hear father's voice, deal with the angry voice os someone who HATES you for no other reason thatn that you ARE! Feel the fear of a planned termination of your life. Try to save yourself from the surgeons knife, kick as you will while he pulls you out feet first. Feel the screeming pain as a scissors is stabbed in the base of your neck. Then your brains are sucked out of your head to collapse it. Easier to extract you that way. Your little body in a trash can - that's how you end up. What a ride your short life has been - and you never, ever even saw your mother's face!

So "who cares"? I DO. AND YOU SHOULD TOO.

Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 06:45
Women are created to be LIFE GIVERS and NURTURERS. Why would they decide to go against who they are? Motherhood is far more fulfilling than a career

REALLY? SAYS WHO MIGHT I ASK?

What about those women who are SHOCK! GASP! BARREN!!! Oh my god! what were they created for? How distressing it must be for them to know that their lives are totally, utterly worthless because they will never have kids.

Really Harmony, i don't think you are in any position to demand that other people start thinking.

By the way Bradish, you can buy birth control at pharmacies and i've yet to go to single mall that didn't have at least one of those. And believe it or not single people and childless people go to the the mall too. Hard to believe I know, but we do like to get out once in a while.

Comment by Anonymous

July 1st 2008 08:09
this is not a misquote, but incomplete, it still misrepresents the original statement.

The entire quote should be posted.

However, I do not support racists on any level, or religious bigots, so I do nto support this person.

the quote above, add the rest of the statement, because you could be sued if you don't.

friendly advice.

Comment by RubySoho

July 1st 2008 13:23
Anonymous the full statement means the exact opposite of what the writer of this blog maninpulated it to mean.

We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to its more rebellious members. As in she didn't want people to get the wrong idea.

Comment by Damo

July 1st 2008 23:48
Sued?

Hahahahahahahaha....

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 00:09
KKK-sanger
Who is that in the centre of this image? Oh yes, it is this delightful lady called Sanger.

Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 00:16
Damo to the rescue again.

Phew! You know for a minute there I was concerned that this
post hadn't denigrated into enough of a farce that was more concerned with scaring people and encouraging them to forgo logical thinking in favour of their base emotions.

I should have known you would come through.

No-one does hypocrisy like the great Damo. What a master. What a champ.

Comment by S.L.

July 2nd 2008 00:26
What's the matter, Ruby? Damo was just showing you the reality of what you think you believe. Sort of like pictures of aborted babies, you know. Seeing your heroic "lady" in her favorite group shouldn't bother you, should it? I'm sure she wouldn't have counted you among the inferior abortion targets... would she?

Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 00:54
I rest my case.

Damo, you should be ashamed of yourself. Don't you ever, ever, EVER claim to be an advocate of intelligent discourse again.

You massive hypocrite.



Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 04:32
Ruby

Delusional to the last.

When you are career bigot it won't change the cold stone that sits in your chest where most people have a heart.

I actually like the predictable way you lash out when your house of cards falls down.

And yes, I have been hated by better quality bigots than you dear madam.



Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 04:40

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 05:50
Ruby

Haven't you worn that word out yet?

Resorting to insults when your whole argument is destroyed with a simple photograph.

Who is the real hypocrite here?

I say it is you, dear madam.

Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 05:55
Stop acting like a hypocrite and I'll stop calling you one.

That photograph has nothing to do with my argument.

But it does make you look like the fanatic that you are.

What happened to "Semantics and Selective Quoting versus Context and Substance'? Or does that rule not apply to fanatical pro-lifers who think that they don't have to stick to facts to support their "cause".?

What does Sanger's relationship with the KKK have to do with Planned Parenthood today?

Can you answer me that?


Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 06:26
Ruby
Ah, another mood swing...The superior Ruby this time.

Stop being a Fanatical Bigot.

Sorry that is too much to ask from you.

Planned parenthood still quote Sanger's arguments to this day and you mindlessly mouth them also.

Where do you think all your mottos come from dear woman?

They come from Sanger's poison little pen when she was trying to institute Eugenics. All this talk of women's 'reproductive rights' are motto's invented by this improper excuse for a human being to sell racial hygiene. And you, like so many others, willingly remain ignorant of the agenda that you are being duped into supporting.

Why, because your seething hatred and bigotry blinds you to the truth even when it is there in front of your eyes.

Hypocrite?
I say that it is you.




Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 06:35
Damo, take your hypocricy and remove it from the vicinity of my uterus please. My body is none of your business. Sanger's dubious connections have nought to do with the fact that I have the right to control my body. Abortion was around for thousands of years before Sanger got involved.

You have the nerve to tell me that my claim to reproductive rights mean that I am an advocate to "racial hygenie?'

I have no time for women-hating, bible-bashing nitwits.

I leave you here with those who are your intellectual peers.


Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 07:25
Oh lookie here everybody, this is what Wiki says about Sanger's lecture to the KKK:

In 1926, in what she called "one of the weirdest experiences I had in lecturing," Sanger even gave a lecture on birth control to the women's auxiliary of the Ku Klux Klan in Silver Lake, New Jersey, a group she found so ignorant she had to use only "the most elementary terms, as though I were trying to make children understand."



Oh my goodness Damo, I actually took your words at face value. I assumed you would not lie about something so easily disprovable.

Sanger was not affiliated with the KKK in any way.

Once again I implore you all to stick to the facts.

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 07:51
Ruby

Another mood change... The indignant Ruby.
Women-hating, bible-bashing nitwits? Such a dignified response. And you say you are not a bigot?

Here is the quote in full.
Not for your benefit but those who are interest in the truth:

Ku Klux Klan from pages 366-367 of Margaret Sanger An Autobiography

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton,"

and also when referring to the KKK:

"In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered. The conversation went on and on, and when we were finally through it was too late to return to New York. Under a curfew law everything in Silver Lake shut at nine o'clock. I could not even send a telegram to let my family know whether I had been thrown in the river or was being held incommunicado. It was nearly one before I reached Trenton, and I spent the night in a hotel."

NAZI connections start next and yes they do exist.


Comment by RubySoho

July 2nd 2008 13:03

Cool. Looking forward to hearing all the lies you want to spread about that to.

Comment by Damo

July 2nd 2008 23:06
Lies Ruby

Those are your speciality, not mine.

Comment by Anonymous

July 3rd 2008 00:04
Damo, take your hypocricy and remove it from the vicinity of my uterus please.

Sleeping with the enemy again ms barren?

Comment by RubySoho

July 3rd 2008 00:14
Damo, I have just caught you out telling a lie on this very post.

I have not lied on this or any other blog. Not once. Not a single time.

But you know, if you are going to call someone a liar it helps to give examples. Examples which cannot be easily refuted.

Comment by Damo

July 3rd 2008 01:32
Ruby


Let put this in Chronological order for you, so that there is no confusion.

I think you are hate a monger, a bigot and a pathological liar who would do anything and say anything to get attention.

You mistake me with some thug who likes to brawl on the street for pleasure.

However since you seem to think that banal insults are something clever I give you this to think about.

Step one: I added a comment to this post that was neither aimed at you or directed at you.

Step two: "Damo could you be more irrelevant?" Who died and made you queen of a blog that you do not own? However manners are not your strong point.

Step Three: You choose to labour the point with a third party. SLB.

Step Four: I provided direct photographic evidence of Sanger speaking at a KKK meeting. They are giving the lovely little familiar salute incase you do not know.

Step Five: Your favorite word is used: Hypocrite. I figure that a raw nerve was struck when you start calling people names. This goes on for while until.

Step 6: You find another few words that are unable to comprehend (another of your weaknesses)and you claim it means something else. (Pathological delusion)

Step 7: I provide the full quote and the quote directly below the one you added. (Yet you would know that if you had gone beyond WIKI.) So now I figure that not only are you a delusional liar but also a stupid one.

Step 8: You start the "Liar liar pants on fire" routine and here we are back to your true self.

Step 9: (This is good). I have not lied on this or any other blog. Hahahaha.....

So that brings us back to ground zero where I am happy that you hate my guts and call me names because every time that you do I am reassured that I must be doing something right.

I never read you posts but by the way you quote mine at me I know that they are just working slowly on you inner fears.

Bahahahahahahaha....

I love Orble and I love the humorless.


Comment by S.L.

July 3rd 2008 02:05
Way to go, Damo!

See what you started, Steven? Ruby is now infesting your blog. Oh lucky you...

Comment by RubySoho

July 3rd 2008 06:10
Damo I think too little of you to actually hate you.

You are preaching to the choir here you know.

I caught you in a lie. Actually caught you and still you deny it? Wow. Just wow.
.

Comment by Anonymous

July 3rd 2008 23:23
Whew! I just got back and checked my mail. Maybe need a bigger sized box; with some flame retardant!

She's not "infecting" my blog. I can simply refuse this to happen by not giving into the temptation of letting her more cynically biting "bait" phrases to get my goat. There are a ton of things she said that I think were taken out of context -- and deliberately so -- and not just for the sake of rebuking me or my views, but to rile everyone one else up -- and just for the sake that as well.

When a person posts something up that becomes controversial and yet that controversy seems more driven for the sake of being argumentative than even attemtping to offer something positive on her/his behalf -- regardless of what her detractors might believe, then I think that individual's only out to string this out mostly for her sake, as opposed to everyone else.

I have other issues wothy of discussing them and so don't we all. While abortion is a lightening rod issue, it's not the only one out there. And for those of us who'd like to build a balanced blog (in terms of subject matter, inasmuch as any syndicated columnists seeks) -- we simply mustn't allow ourselves to get mired down by a few sharp biting comments that are thrown out most often for the hell of it by some people who perhaps would give anything to enjoy a complete attitudinal overhaul in life.

My sincerest thanks for everyone who's shonw interest in my blog and this post -- especially enough interest in taking the time to post a comment or more -- but we have to move on.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
49 Posts
53 Posts
138 Posts dating from June 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Steven P. Barrett's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Steven P. Barrett
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]